“I
daresay you haven’t had much practice,” said the White Queen. “When I was your
age, I always did it for half-an-hour a day. Why, sometimes I’ve believed as
many as six impossible things before breakfast.”
(Lewis
Carroll, The Annotated Alice: Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through
the Looking-Glass, p. 251).
I
found Winkie to be an intriguing and thought-provoking book with a
lovable and, best of all, odd main
character. The story has great depth and it certainly warrants a second reading
due to its intricacy and openness to interpretation. As a member of the Chicago
Surrealist Group, I have always been a great admirer of books which contain a
healthy dose of weirdness and absurdity. Having enjoyed many books, short
stories, and poems which dealt with twisted logic, dreamlike imagery, parallel
universes, automatic writing, and truly bizarre characters, and I must say, I
think that Winkie is well on its way to becoming a classic in that
genre.
Absurdity in literature is a very
useful tool in interpreting our surrounding environment. By the act of turning
events and behavior on their heads, absurdity teaches us to view such things
from multiple angles and asses the true logic behind them. Absurdity strips
away the smoke and mirrors in our society and can show us exactly how bizarre societal
norms, the status quo, and human behavior can be.
Winkie uses absurdity in a
very unique and creative manner. By making the main character an animated
stuffed teddy bear come to life, the book presents us with a truly innocent
victim of circumstance. It is obvious that he is innocent of all the outlandish
accusations that are attributed to him (Chase, p. 85). If Winkie had been a
human being, the absurdity of the accusations and the hostility of his jailers,
the judicial system, and the public at large may not have come across in such
an obvious manner. If a human being were the main character of the book, he/she
would have gender, race, age, economic background, political belief system,
sexual orientation, social network of friends, etc, and thus wouldn’t have the
“blank slate” nature which Winkie possesses. Many attributes, such as gender
and sexual activity, as well as political and religious associations were all
projected onto him by the people around him (Chase, p. 61). For example, the
chief detective interrogates Francoise, stating, “We know for a fact that the
two of you had sex, that Miss Winkie seduced you, and that’s how you were drawn
into this conspiracy” (Chase, p. 59). Since Winkie has no gender, he (and I use
the word ‘he’ lightly in this instance) has no sex organs to use for
intercourse. Being a teddy bear, Winkie comes across as an innocent child who
doesn’t understand his surroundings and is confused by the behavior of the humans
around him.
I found many interesting parallels
between Winkie and Lewis Carroll’s two Alice books, Alice’s Adventures in
Wonderland, and its sequel, Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice
Found There, classics in literature of the absurd. The Alice books have been a great
inspiration to me as an artist. As Penelope Rosemont, the doyenne of American
surrealism, stated, “Surrealists like Alice in Wonderland: it fits the
surrealist idea perfectly” (Telephone interview, 1 April 2009). Both Alice and
Winkie are transplanted from their familiar domestic surroundings to a realm
where twisted logic reigns supreme, most of the characters they encounter are
rude and even hostile, and they have few resources, save for a handful of understanding
individuals who help them navigate their way through a world gone mad.
Winkie begins his journey to this
new existence by smashing a bedroom window and jumping out into the garden
(Chase. p. 120). Alice
begins her trip by falling down a rabbit hole (Carroll, p.26) and walking
through a mirror into a looking-glass house where backwards logic prevails (Carroll,
p. 184). Winkie arrives in this new world and he finds himself alone in a
strange environment which bears little resemblance to the world he once knew.
Winkie’s defense attorney, Charles Unwin,
appears discombobulated as he stutters and stammers throughout Winkie’s trial,
yet he proves to be of great value at the end of the trial, when the prosecutor’s
favorite assistant, Judy, reveals that the office of the prosecution withheld
important evidence, thus enabling Unwin to discover the hermit’s notebooks
which exonerate Winkie (Chase, p. 225). Unwin holds some similarities to the
White Knight in Through the Looking-Glass. Alice, who is a pawn, is
protected by the White Knight from any attacking chess pieces. The White Knight
is a rather clumsy character who falls off his horse after every move he makes
(just as a knight in an actual game of chess moves two squares, then one square
to the side). In the end, he does succeed in giving her guidance and safeguarding
her from attack (Carroll, p. 314).
The political climate in which
Winkie finds himself is very hostile and the authorities are aiming for a
speedy guilty verdict and possibly a sentence for Winkie’s execution: in
essence, a kangaroo court (Chase, p. 195). Alice also finds herself at an insane trial in
which the King’s messenger, the Mad Hatter, is accused of stealing the tarts.
This trial is also a kangaroo court because the Queen of Hearts says, “Sentence
first, verdict afterwards”, and yells, “Off with his head” throughout the trial
(Carroll, p. 161). The White Queen tells Alice
that the King’s messenger “is in prison now, being punished: and the trial
doesn’t even begin till next Wednesday: and of course the crime comes last of
all” (Carroll, p. 248). Similar backwards logic takes place in Winkie,
in which Winkie is being punished by many of his captors before the trial even
started. One example is when the prosecutor addresses the entire courtroom and
says, “The people move that this trial be ended now and the defendant be
executed immediately” (Chase, p. 194.) He is already seen as being guilty
before there was any verdict.
The authorities have a tough time
believing that Winkie is indeed a stuffed teddy bear. Instead they keep insisting
that he is a master of disguise, despite the testimony of the teddy bear
expect, Penelope Brackle, who reveals that Winkie is in fact, a stuffed bear
manufactured in London in 1921 (Chase, p. 200). Haigha, the King’s Anglo-Saxon
Messenger, says, “This is a child”, as he introduces Alice to the Unicorn. To which the Unicorn replies,
“I always thought they were fabulous monsters! Is it alive?” Alice responds, “I always thought Unicorns
were fabulous monsters, too! I never saw one alive before!” “Well, now since we
have seen each other, “says the Unicorn, “if you’ll believe in me, I’ll believe
in you. Is that a bargain?” (Carroll, p. 287) If only Winkie had had such an
easy time making the authorities believe that he was just a teddy bear!
Winkie contains numerous
references to figures and events in history, most notably, the trials of
Socrates, Oscar Wilde, and Galileo (Chase, p. 85). One absurd historical
reference pertains to the Afflicted Girls: Ann Putnam, Abigail Williams, and
Elizabeth Hubbard. These are three girls who testified in the Salem Witch
Trials, which started in the winter of 1692 (Nash, p. 84). The instant Winkie
gazes upon the three girls as they sit in the witness box, the girls all fall
to the floor and display bizarre theatrics. For example, Putnam says, “I won’t,
I won’t, I won’t sign the devil’s book” (Chase, p. 187). The prosecutor then
states, “Judge, if the accused be allowed to look upon them no longer, and if
he should only then touch them but once, their fits surely will cease.” With
Winkie’s touch, their hysterics come to an abrupt end (Chase, p. 188).
In Through the Looking-Glass, the Lion and the Unicorn fighting for
the crown refers to the dissatisfaction of many of Scotland ’s
citizens after the Act of Union in 1707, during which the Scottish and English
governments joined to form the United
Kingdom . (Carroll, p. 283) The British coat
of arms consists of a shield in the center, a golden crowned Lion on the left
representing England and the
Crown, while on the right is an uncrowned Unicorn, representing Scotland . In
the coat of arms used by the Scottish Office, a crowned Unicorn is on the left, with the crowned Lion on the right
(Willcox, p. 35).
Absurdity
has also been used in a very creative way in Alice in Quantumland: An
Allegory of Quantum Physics. In the book, Alice shrinks to the size of a nuclear
particle and encounters various strange individuals who each take turns
demonstrating different aspects of quantum physics to her. Quantum physics is
rather quirky and full of paradoxes to begin with, thus using bizarre and
twisted logic to illustrate these theories is a brilliant idea. Just as Winkie
wishes himself into existence (Chase, p. 119), there is a theory in quantum
physics which postulates that one can wish things into existence. With the use
of mind over matter, an Emperor can utilize his conscious mind to make his new
clothes real. The Emperor illustrates this thesis to Alice by asserting that, “The whole world is
indeed governed by the laws of quantum mechanics, but the human mind is outside
the material world and not so restricted. We have the ability to see things
uniquely. We cannot choose what we see, but what we do see becomes reality in the
world, at least for the time we observe it. When we have finished our
observation, then of course the world can once again begin to enter its
customary set of mixed states.” (Gilmore, p. 58)
Lastly,
I would like to touch upon how Winkie and Alice both use the blurred
line between dream and reality to question what has truly transpired and what
may have been a dream. After Winkie wishes himself into existence and jumps out
the window, he falls asleep in the garden. Upon awakening, he finds himself on
the shelf in his room again, as if he had never escaped. He again wishes
himself into existence and finds himself outside again. Winkie “seemed to be
traveling in time” (Chase, p. 122), and felt that “perhaps time itself had
stopped” (Chase, p. 121). These feelings are sometimes encountered in a
dream-like state. It isn’t really clear whether Winkie dreams all his
adventures as he continues to sit on the bookshelf, or whether everything is
real. Alice , in
turn, wakes up at the end of her adventures down the rabbit hole, only to find
herself sitting next to her sister in the garden. Alice in Wonderland ends
with Alice ’s sister dreaming of Alice in her wonderland (Carroll,
p. 162). In Through the Looking-Glass, Alice
encounters the sleeping Red King, and she is told that the King is dreaming of
her, and he should not be awoken, otherwise Alice would cease existing. Tweedledum tells Alice , “If the King was
to wake, you’d go out -- bang! – just like a candle!” (Carroll, p. 238) Since Alice is dreaming of the King, and the King is dreaming of
Alice , and so
on, it creates a truly peculiar state of being, like two mirrors facing each
other.
A Dream Within A Dream
Take this kiss upon the brow!
And, in parting from you now,
Thus much let me avow –
You are not wrong, who deem
That my days have been a dream:
Yet if hope has flown away
In a night, or in a day,
In a vision, or in none,
Is it therefore the less gone?
All that we
see or seem
Is but a dream within a dream.
I stand amid the roar
Of a surf-tormented shore,
And I hold within my hand
Grains of the golden sand –
How few! Yet how they creep
Through my fingers to the deep,
While I weep – while I weep!
O God! Can I not grasp
Them with a tighter clasp?
O God! Can I not save
One from the
pitiless wave?
Is all that we see or seem
But a dream within a dream?
Edgar Allen Poe, 1849
Bibliography
Carroll, Lewis. The
Annotated Alice : Alice ’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through
The
Looking-Glass. New York :
Wing Books, 1998.
Chase, Clifford.
Winkie. New York :
Grove Press, 2006.
Gilmore, Robert. Alice in Quantumland: An Allegory
of Quantum Physics. New York :
Copernicus
Books, 1995.
Nash, Gary B.,
Julie Roy Jeffrey, John R. Howe, Peter J. Frederick, Allen F. Davis, and
Allen
M. Winkler. The American People: Creating a Nation and a Society. New
Rosemont,
Penelope. Telephone Interview. 1 April 2009
Willcox, William
B., Walter L. Armstein. The Age of Aristocracy: 1688 – 1830.
Lexington,
MA, D.C. Heath and Company, 1988.
No comments:
Post a Comment