With
the advent of the 19th century came an unprecedented period of
advancement. The Industrial Age, along with advancements in chemistry, biology,
medicine and various other sciences ushered in a new world. But with great advancements
come great responsibilities. The human race certainly progresses at an alarming
rate thanks to various discoveries and innovations, yet ethics, unfortunately, seems
to progress at a much slower rate. This was certainly the case regarding
medicine in the 19th century.
The
medical establishment was male dominated in the 19th century. Women
were barred from attending medical school and it was a long, hard fight for the
few women who managed to break into medicine. The advent of Feminism and
research on the issue of Homosexuality gave rise to the reactionary response of
the male dominated medical community, to clearly define the essential differences
between males and females. Homosexuality was deemed perverted at that time, and
went under the term “inverse.” The medical establishment focused its energy on
politicizing sexual ‘innate’ differences and wished to eliminate Hermaphroditism,
which had no place in the binary view of the sexes which, in turn, kept
everyone ‘in their place.’ Therefore, Herculine Barbin’s sexuality, for
example, ‘had to be remedied’ as to ensure it wasn’t inverted, thus explaining
hir attraction to women as heterosexual in nature.
Anne
Fausto-Sterling presents a prime example of an intersex individual, Levi
Suydam, who was examined in 1843 by a physician and deemed to be male, this
allowing him to vote. Since voting rights, inheritance rights, wages, and
numerous other rights were not equal between men and women, a change in sex
status made a world of difference to the standard of living as well as the
space (male space vs. female space) that an individual occupied. This
constituted significant difference in the 19th century than it does
now, due in great part to various equal rights laws which have since been
passed although much work still lays ahead in order to truly level the playing field
in sex/gender rights and dynamics.
It is interesting to note that the
medical establishment of that era placed a great deal of importance on the
reproductive organs in determining the sex of an individual. Women were seen as
having to bear children, thus needed a functioning uterus and fully formed
vagina. Males, in turn, had to have a penis and ejaculatory discharge in order
to be identified as male. The physicians, who administered Herculine’s autopsy,
noted that zie had a penis, a vagina which ended in a cul de sac (i.e. no
cervix and no uterus), and ejaculatory discharge, therefore, they concluded
that zie was male (Foucault, 128). No mention was made as to whether hir ejaculatory
fluid was found to contain spermatozoa or not. It is quite plausible that hir
ejaculate contained no sperm, since sperm only makes up about 5% of ejaculatory
fluid; it would require closer examination to detect sperm (Davis , 1947).
The medical authorities stamping
‘female’ or ‘male’ on the identities of intersex individuals continues to this
day, although not as fervently as in the 1800s. The continuation of this
medical practice throughout the 20th century was due in large part
to the strict division of sex-roles in post WWII suburbia. Common medical
practice was to assign a sex onto a newborn infant with ambiguous genitalia. Genital
surgery was routinely performed on such infants, often without the knowledge of
the parents. This was done to protect the parents and the child from the ‘anguish’
of having to be a ‘sexual freak’ (Fausto-Sterling, 23).
The
operative question is whether this ‘anguish’ is that of the individual, or the
anguish of society at large coming face-to-face with the fact that sexes exist
on a continuum, as opposed to existing on a black and white binary with no
variation. Intersex individuals have been documented in various societies worldwide;
including numerous Native American societies, known as Two-Spirit individuals,
as well as Hijras in India ,
for example. These societies allow intersex individuals to play an active role
in their societies, a role which is also useful to the society at large. The
derogatory term ‘berdache’ has been bestowed onto the intersex Native
Americans, but each nation has a different term for them in their own language.
The Navajo nation, for example, uses the term ‘nadleeche’ which translates into
“someone in a constant process of change” (Jacobs, 103).
There is currently a movement to cease the
needless medical practice of sex assignment at birth. This out-dated and cruel practice
is slowly being phased out across America . The United States
is currently in flux regarding sex roles. With the rise in stay-at-home-dads,
male unemployment rates higher than that of women, and fathers finally being
allowed into the traditional woman space of the birthing chamber, sex roles are
being reinvented and reconsidered as we speak. The current scientific view is
that these children can decide their sex once they are older based on how they
feel and how they identify.
Work
Cited:
Taber’s
Encyclopedic Medical Dictionary (Ed. 19), Venes, Donald, ed, F.A. Davis
Company, Philadelphia , PA , 2001
No comments:
Post a Comment